Photography feedback from industry experts

Continually improve your photography skills at any level with critique that has all the development benefits of entering photo competitions but without the pressure. The only person you're competing with is yourself!

Example Critiques

Below are some examples of critiques that would be given through our service. Please note that the amount of feedback, the balance between positive and constructive feedback, and the content of feedback will depend greatly on the submitted image.

When submitting an image for critique, the photographer is also able to submit questions about their photograph for the expert to answer or focus on, allowing more specific feedback and direction.

During the submission process the photographer can also choose between receiving feedback, or also receiving a score and potentially a commendation or award.

Night Landscape

A landscape photograph of the Seceda Ridgeline in Italy, photographed to include star trails at night.

Photo: Marek P

Thank you for submitting this beautiful image of the Seceda Ridgeline in the Italian Dolomites. I can see the effort you put into this image through the planning of being in this location during snow at night, as well as the use of a very long exposure to capture the Earth's rotation through star trails.

Placing the ridgeline in the centre on the lower third line gives the rock formations strength, which helps them hold against the power of the sky above. With the snow acting as a diffuser, the light is beautifully gentle on the landscape, and the exposure is spot on.

Although your image has a polished feel and displays substantial technical expertise, there are a few areas where we could look to improve it.

The image's strong vignette, while intending to bring people into the image, draws attention to the technique used. This isn't because vignettes are bad, but because the darkening in the lower-left corner is causing the forest area to lose definition and for the tones to become muddied. In the lower right the tones of snow darken in a way that isn't visually cohesive. This also affects the sky, particularly in the top left which has become quite dark in tone.

In this particular image, the strength and colour contrast of the main subject (the ridgeline) is substantial and the vignette is not needed to give it greater strength.

While it is difficult to manage, when shooting this kind of scene you could take a separate exposure for the snow being illuminated by the Refugio in the lower right, as this is causing the highlights on the snow to be lost. You could also potentially address this in post-production by using a healing brush tool, or if you don't intend to enter it into any competitions, you could potentially use generative fill in photoshop if you have the program. It excels at filling in these kind of areas with texture that feels very authentic.

The image represents excellent quality professional work. It is engaging, has strong visual impact and it is processed with subtlety allowing the subject matter to sing.

7/10 Highly Commended
(Excellent professional work - High technical quality, refined style)

Studio Portrait
Fighter Portrait
Wedding
Live Music
Food
Residential Interior
Seascape
TESTIMONIALS

What users say...

I couldn't be happier with how my images were critiqued. It enabled me to develop my skills quickly etc. 

Name

I couldn't be happier with how my images were critiqued. It enabled me to develop my skills quickly etc. 

Name

I couldn't be happier with how my images were critiqued. It enabled me to develop my skills quickly etc. 

Name

The Process

Create a free account and access critiques on demand. No subscriptions, ongoing fees, or long waits for critique! Just pay for what you want to use.

It's easy to sign up, requires no payment information, and you can be inside our site in minutes.

Submit images or even folios in a wide variety of genres. You can even submit projects, exhibitions, books or a website. You can see an example of type and genre of critique when logged in.

Receive extensive feedback from our genre experts on what you're doing well, and modifications to consider.

As you can see above there can also be a scoring component to better understand how your image may be perceived, but you can opt out of this.

Achieve certificates, trophies, and long-term titles as recognition for your high quality photography as it meets our scoring criteria. Just like awards, but focused on you, and with no competition with others.

Your scores are also private, it's your choice whether to and how to share your successes.

The Scoring Range

The scoring range is intended to provide further feedback and information on how a submitted image is perceived, and also allow for the tracking of general improvement for photographers across multiple submissions.

The scoring of art or photography is ultimately subjective, however this is a very brief example of how scoring may be assessed. The scores are out of 10 and do not follow traditional or usually perceived number rankings. For example scoring a 3 out of 10 could be a great result for a new photographer and a great platform for their future development.

  • 1 Indicates an entry level image which may contain major technical flaws and poor composition. However substantial improvement can be made quickly from here.
  • 2 A basic standard of image which may contain noticeable issues and lacks appeal. A good place to make rapid improvements from.
  • 3 Standard amateur level which may be decent but unremarkable. Represents a normal level of amateur photography.
  • 4 Good amateur level which includes competent technique and may include an interesting subject.
  • 5 An image which is approaching professional quality. Includes strong technique and a suitable composition.
  • 6 COMMENDED An image which represents a professional standard which is polished and may have a marketable quality.
  • 7 HIGHLY COMMENDED Excellent professional work with a high technique quality, refined style and impact.
  • 8 SILVER AWARD An image that has an award-winning quality including technical excellence and some level or originality. Represents approximately the top 20% of submissions.
  • 9 GOLD AWARD An image that has a high level of award-winning quality, technical mastery, exceptional creativity and profound impact. Represents approximately the top 2% of submissions.
  • 10 DIAMOND AWARD A world-class image with perfect technique, artistry, and the creative vision is fully realised. May have a timeless or iconic feel. Represents less than the top 1% of submissions.
SATISFACTION GUARANTEED

Submit your photography for critique today!